Is Money Truly Not Buy Happiness - 1457 Words

It is often said that money cannot buy happiness. Money can buy the best of food and drink. It can buy land and with enough it can even buy social status. The availability of monetary funds also ensures that bills will be paid and that in and of itself reduces stress. Knowing all of this, the old adage, money cannot buy happiness becomes questionable. Can money truly not buy happiness? Anton Chekov’s Yermolà ¡i Lopà ¡khin and Leo Tolstoy’s Ivan Ilyich are two fictional characters that explore men of money and status. Each story and character are unique in various ways, but they have glaring similarities. Ultimately, Lopà ¡khin and Ilyich depict happiness as relative to the individual and the result of their own actions. Lopà ¡khin and Ilyich are both sociable men who turn serious when a job related task is at hand. Lopà ¡khin spends his spare time with the people at the Cherry Orchard. He teases and utilizes sarcasm in conversation, but turns serious wh en speaking of business matters. He does not take his work lightly. Ilyich plays takes great joy in playing bridge after work hours with his friends. Illyich, like Lopà ¡khin, is very serious about his work. Ilyich is born to a ranking official. His family affords him the luxury of an education. He goes to law school and later becomes a member of the court of justice. Lopà ¡khin is born in a much lower status: his father is a serf. During Lopà ¡khin’s lifetime, the serfs are emancipated and although it is not explainedShow MoreRelatedMoney Can Buy Happiness : Happiness1653 Words   |  7 PagesMoney Can Buy Happiness Happiness, has long been an estate that huge numbers of individuals endeavor to create a path, that seeks to find it. Extensive research, surprisingly enough, does not have definitive answers on the concept of what makes one happy. As a matter of fact; there are as many attempts to define happiness, as there are the many scholars, theologians, psychologist and philosophers, curious enough to research it. Many ¬Ã‚ ¬; are unsuccessful in comparison to the ready definition ofRead MoreMoney Is A Big Part Of Life952 Words   |  4 PagesMoore English Period 1 2/26/15 Money is a big part of life. However, people tend to have a misconception that money contributes to happiness. It is not possible to â€Å"buy happiness. Conversely, everyone should be aware that it is friendships, good health, and family that truly brings one happiness to which a person aspires. In the book The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, the concept of money being able to buy happiness is a widespread theme. Money is unable to create a sense of contentmentRead MoreMaterial Possessions Does Not Being Happiness1010 Words   |  4 Pagesmaterial possessions—money, property, jewelry, clothing—make people truly happy? Does it have a permanent positive impact? There is an accurate and well known saying that, Money cannot buy happiness. In this modernized world material possessions—including money, wealth, jewelry, and housing—is more a part of necessity for daily living rather than happiness. People can argue any method, whether material posses sions result in true happiness or not. However, if one wants permanent happiness then they don’tRead MoreMoney and Happiness1743 Words   |  7 PagesCan Money Buy Happiness In todays materialistic world, the phrase that ‘money cant buy happiness is tending to be proved hence otherwise. Social research and surveys have shown results based on an individuals income, health and the political scenario which is dominant in his or her region. It is quite obvious that the gap between the privileged and the not so is growing into a great divide giving rise to different class and status, thus defining ones social circle. It should therefore be understoodRead MoreCan Money Buy Happiness?1646 Words   |  7 PagesCan Money Buy Happiness? Happiness is a positive emotion which all humans experience but which cannot be defined through a monetary value. Money is the symbol of greed and desire. It leads to overconsumption allowing for us the consumers to forcibly satisfy all of our desires in life instead of on spending our money on our needs and on the essential things in life that people need in order to survive and maintain a well-balanced lifestyle. Although some people may say that money can buy happinessRead MoreMoney Can t Buy Everything Essay1134 Words   |  5 PagesMoney Can’t Buy Everything What is the necessity of money in life? Does it truly bring us happiness? How much do I want or need the comforts of material objects in my life? There is a famous song from Chris Janson that does a pretty good job of summing it up. Chris says Money can t buy happiness, but it can buy me a boat. I would agree with this! I like to believe that I am a family man. Families are an essence of life. I feel the root of all happiness begins within the wall of your own home.Read MoreMoney And Happiness Essay1452 Words   |  6 PagesMoney and Happiness Can poor people be happy? Can rich people be unhappy? The answer to both questions is yes. However, this does not mean that there is not a strong correlation between money and happiness. Money is a pillar of this capitalistic society and without money, the system of government would not work. With that in mind think about happiness and how that correlates with money. Money can buy happiness because money can help solve a lot of problems, it makes life easier for people, and itRead MoreMoney Can Buy You Happiness936 Words   |  4 PagesMany people say that money cant buy you happiness, well I don’t find that to be true. Having a large amount of money has become a dream in many peoples lives. Although money can buy you thing you want to make you happy, happiness is only bought by the people you surround your self with. Many people are convinced that money can buy a person happiness, however most happiness comes from families and friends. Money can buy you happiness because, m oney can buy you security, stress free, healthcare, andRead MoreValues In The Great Gatsby Analysis878 Words   |  4 Pagesdancing the same dances, and overall having the same values, people felt united. In the novel, The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, these values are reflected in the characters’ lifestyles. A recurring theme in the novel is that money cannot buy a person’s true happiness, and this theme is exhibited in the various characters actions, choices, and what they value most in their lives. The first character who captures values of the people in the 1920s is Gatsby. Living a lavish lifestyle, GatsbyRead Moremoney can buy you happiness Essay767 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿ Money can buy you happiness. Discuss with references to the theory and some empirical evidence on the issue. The set point theory According to this theory,the individual propensity to happiness is a personal trait of largely genetic origin and influenced by personality.The explanation for the stagnation of happiness is that happiness is a stochastic phenomenon.Chance distributes unequal amounts of happiness among people’s genetic codes ,leaving the average level unchanged. The decreasing

Make Water Glow With This Easy Science Project

Its easy to make glowing water to use for fountains or as the basis for other projects. Basically, all you need is water and a chemical to make it glow. Heres what you need to do. Chemicals That Make Water Glow in the Dark There are a couple of ways you get science projects to glow in the dark. You can use glow-in-the-dark paint, which is phosphorescent and glows anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours. Glowing paint or powder tends not to be very soluble, so it is good for some projects and not others. Tonic water glows very brightly when exposed to black light and is great for edible projects. The fluorescent dye is another option for a bright effect under a black light. You can extract non-toxic fluorescent dye from a highlighter pen to make glowing water: Use a knife to (carefully) cut a highlighter pen in half. Its a pretty simple steak knife and cutting board procedure.Pull out the ink-soaked felt that is inside the pen.Soak the felt in a small quantity of water.   Once you have the dye you can add it to more water to make glowing fountains, grow certain types of glowing crystals, make glowing bubbles, and use it for many other water-based projects.

The God and Evil Problem Essay - 2279 Words

The God and Evil Problem A strong argument against the existence of a Christian God is contained in the theodicy problem. The existence of suffering is not compatible with an omniscient, omnipotent, omni benevolent superior being. An all-knowing being would be aware that suffering is and always will be in existence; an all-powerful being would be able to prevent suffering; and a perfectly good being would desire to end suffering. Many Christian thinkers have sought to justify this contradiction, and one of the most common counterarguments to the theodicy problem is contained in the free-will defense. Through interpretations of St. Augustine, J.L. Mackie, and David Humes arguments in reference to the God and evil problem, the†¦show more content†¦Augustine blames evil on the mans free will, yet does not blame God for having given man free will. Throughout his Confessions, St. Augustine takes full responsibility for his sins, essentially because he solely places the blame on himself for consciously deciding to turn from God and commit them. As a result of the sins of Adam and Eve, man is no longer has the propensity toward good. The Fall left man unable not to sin. But, the free will defense actually argues that Gods decision to do this was a good thing. Instead of creating beings which were predisposed to good, he made man equally capable of both good and evil. In doing so, God made man morally free. But, because God created the possibility for evil to exist, He also cannot prevent its coming about. As is very evident, some people do choose evil. For Augustine, one can only be saved from the evils of sin through Gods grace. As is prominent throughout the Confessions, as long as a sinner confesses, expresses true sorrow for his wrongful acts, and vows to amend his ways, he will be forgiven. Augustine supports the notion that God is warranted in bringing good out of evil. It is through the commission of evil and even more so the reaction to that commission, that God discovers his true believers. This concept, along with much of the remainder of Augustines support of the argument proves faulty. Inherent in Augustines support ofShow MoreRelatedThe Problem Of Evil And The Existence Of God1636 Words   |  7 PagesThe Problem of Evil is one of the most influential and common arguments in modern philosophy against the existence of a Greater Being, God (Trakakis, 2006). Both Theist, those who believe in the existence of God, and Atheist, those who don’t believe in the existence of God, argue that evil exists in the world. The Problem of Evil explores whether the existence of evil and suffering constitutes significance evidence for atheism. When looking at the definition of the greater being, most refer to theRead More God And The Problem Of Evil Essay1252 Words   |  6 PagesGod And The Problem Of Evil Everyday it is possible to read a newspaper, or turn on TV or radio news and learn about evil going on in our world. Banks are robbed, cars are stolen, violent murders and rapes are committed. Somewhere in the world the aftershock of an earthquake is being felt. Cancer is killing millions of people each year, while other debilitating conditions continue to affect many with no cure to end their suffering. President Bush said that our country is fighting a war againstRead MoreThe Problem Of Evil Questions God s Existence995 Words   |  4 PagesThe Problem of Evil Questions God’s Existence An argument against the existence of God is based on the presence of evil in the world. This deductively valid argument is divided into two categories; human action and natural evil (Sober, 2005, p. 120). Human action discusses how experiences makes us better people, while natural evil are tragic events that are not under the control of humans. Each category is used as evidence to refute God as an all-powerful omniscient, omnibenevolent, or omnipotentRead MoreThe Problem Of Evil : An Argument Against The Existence Of God1922 Words   |  8 PagesNotes †¢ The problem of evil (the problem of suffering) is an argument against the existence of God †¢ The argument against the existence of God is incompatible with the existence of an all-loving, all-powerful God. Greek Philosopher Epicurus The Epicurean Paradox †¢ Is God willing, but not able to prevent evil? †¢ Answer: Then he is not omnipotent †¢ Is God able but not willing? †¢ Then he is malevolent †¢ Is he both able and willing? †¢ Then whence cometh evil? †¢ Is he neither able nor willingRead MoreThe Existence Of God And The Battle Between Good And Evil1386 Words   |  6 PagesThe existence of God and the battle between good and evil has been a topic of much discussion for centuries. Through the philosophical scope, there is a â€Å"Problem of Evil† that challenges the existence an all-powerful God if there is evil in the world. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, was a German philosopher who argued about the topic of the problem of evil. Leibniz argued that (1) evil is not necessary; (2) that there is evil in the world because as humans we are restricted in our knowledge since we areRead MoreProblem Of Evil And The Free Will Defense1038 Words   |  5 PagesPHI2010 Kearns 19 October 2017 Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense Evil is something that exists in many forms. From big evils like Hitler’s Holocaust and slavery, to small evils like getting a papercut and getting stuck in the rain (perhaps to some this might be a big evil), evil is basically anything that is not good. For theologians, evil poses several problems, most notably when it comes to the existence of God. To most theologists, God has a set definition. God is defined as an all-powerfulRead MoreMr. L. Mackie s Evil And Omnipotence1718 Words   |  7 PagesJ. L. Mackie’s â€Å"Evil and Omnipotence† criticizes the argument that God exists by showing that religious beliefs are positively irrational and that parts of the essential theological doctrine are inconsistent with one another. The problem of evil is one of the oldest problems in philosophy. The problem of evil is a logical problem for only the people who believe that there is a God who is both (1) omnipotent and (2) wholly good; yet (3) evil exists in the world. If God is wholly good and omnipotentRead MoreEssay on The Problem with Evil in Religion1259 Words   |  6 PagesThe problem of evil is widely considered as the most detrimental problem to the monotheist. It is also the primary objection to the overall existence of God. The problem is very easy to comprehend: If God is an all-perfect, all-knowing, all-powerf ul deity then why do we live in a world with any imperfection or negativity at all? Why do bad things happen at all? Especially to the good people in the world and the millions of innocent people who suffer on a daily basis. Gottfreid Leibniz was a philosopherRead MoreThe Problem of Evil Essay examples957 Words   |  4 PagesThe Problem of Evil A) For what reasons may suffering create philosophical problems for a religious believer? (10) B) Outline two solutions to these problems and comment on their success (10) A) The problem of suffering has been around since the dawn of time, or as religious philosophers believe; since Adam and Eve first sinned in the Garden of Eden. The first problem that arises from evil is that we believe that the God of classical theism has certain attributesRead MoreDoes God Or Evil Really Exist?1174 Words   |  5 PagesDoes God/ evil really exist? All of the living things have to be set by all of evils thing in the world: sickness, agony, happiness, suffering the live and death. God creates incredible things and leaves all of them for human to freely use as they want. However, the more they have the more temptation they get. That’s why there are a lot of questionable about a creator, God based on all of these kinds of events happened. Is this belief in a benevolent God not at least paradoxical in the face of such

Civil Rights And Disobedience Essay Example For Students

Civil Rights And Disobedience Essay By acting civil but disobedient you are able to protest things you dont thinkare fair, non-violently. Henry David Thoreau is one of the most importantliterary figures of the nineteenth century. Thoreaus essay CivilDisobedience, which was written as a speech, has been used by many greatthinkers such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Ghandi as a map to fightagainst injustice. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a pastor that headed the CivilRights movement. He was a gifted speaker and a powerful writer whose philosophywas non-violent but direct action. Dr.Kings strategy was to have sit-ins,boycotts, and marches. Dr. Kings Letter from Birmingham Jail was basedon the principles of Thoreaus Civil Disobedience. Both Martin LutherKing Jr. and Henry David Thoreau are exceptional persuasive writers. Even thoughboth writers are writing on ways to be civil but disobedient, they have oppositeways of convicing you. Dr. King is religious, gentle and apologetic, focusing onwhats good for the group; while Thoreau is very aggressive and assertive for hisown personal hate against the government. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and HenryDavid Thoreau have the same ideas, but view them differently. Dr. King wants toultimately raise awareness and open doors for the better of a group. Thoreauwants more individual rights for people. Dr. King is explaining his view ofconscience: I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tellshim is unjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arousethe conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing thevery highest respect for the law (Martin Luther King, p. 521). This quote showsDr. Kings opinion on going to jail. King knows that he was unjustly put intojail. He accepts going to jail even though he was put in jail wrongly. Thecommunity then knows of the injustice and should pressure the government. Theother thing that happens is King is respecting the law by obeying it. He is apeaceful man and wants justice, but believes in following the rules peacefullyto get the job done. Thoreau feels that conscience plays a more personal role. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide rightand wrong, but conscience? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in theleast degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man aconscience, then. I think that we should be men first, and subject afterward(Henry David Thoreau, p.581). Thoreau is questioning why majorities make therules. He is questioning democracy. Hes telling us to question anything we doand why we should give into the government if we do not agree with a rule. Whyshould we be individuals with brains and have thoughts of our own if we are notallowed to think for ourselves and do what we want? If we believe we are free,why do we have so many rules? Thoreau believes we should be real to ourselvesand live for ourselves, not the government. King wants to change the lawsbecause they are morally wrong and Thoreau wants to change the law because hepersonally doesnt like it. Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King bothagree in justice exists. Thoreau thinks of injustice as friction or tension thatcan wear the machine down. King thinks that injustice just exists and tensionmust be created with direct action to negotiate with the machine. Thoreauexplians, If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine ofgovernment, let it go, let it go: perchance it will wear smooth,- certainly thatmachine will wear out, but if it is of such a nature that it requires you tobe the agent of injustice to another , then, I say, break the law. Let your lifebe a counter friction to stop the machine. (Henry David Thoreau, p.587). .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .postImageUrl , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:hover , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:visited , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:active { border:0!important; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:active , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Personal Narrative - My Dad and the Sphinx! person EssayInjustice is a cause of friction, which is brought on by the government. Thegovernment has created something that is working against itself; if the frictionof the injustice is left alone it will continue to grind down the machine. Onceagain Thoreau questions if you can wait that long and what are you personallygoing to do about the injustice. Thoreau says use your life to stop the machine. Dr. King explains, injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. Weare caught in an inescapable network of mutuality tied in a single garment ofdestiny. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly (King p.516). If we allow injustice to affect any one place the government knows they can getaway with it. If people dont fight injustice the government will continue toallow it because they know they can get away with it. We are all tied togetherin a mutual destiny; we are all in the same boat, what ever affects you affectsme. How can you sit and watch injustice happen, we are all connected; whatinjustice happens to me happens to you. Both Thoreau and King are trying toprove the point that we are our brothers keeper. We all need to fightinjustice to save each other. Thoreau and King have said what role conscienceplays for them and that injustice exists but you must use your conscience todecide what to do. Now they discuss just and unjust laws. Thoreau explains,unjust laws exist: Shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor toamend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress themat once. ( Henry David Thoreau, p.586) Thoreau is acknowledging that unjust lawsexist. I think he figured like the sun rises every morning there will be unjustlaws. How you deal with them if you do not approve of them is the question. Thoreau asks, will you be happy to just obey the law for as long as it takes tochange the law by the governments rules?Do you want immediate acton? If youfollow the governments rules it will take a very long time to appeal theunjust law in court and they still may not change the law. Can you wait thatlong?Or, should you take drastic direct action to be heard at once. Are youwilling to be arrested? Can you handle the responsibility for your actions, orare you scared. Thoreau is impleying that you should not wine about somethinginless you are ready and able to take the conciquinces. Dr. King explains how hejustifies breaking some laws and following others; the fact is there are simplytwo types of laws. Dr. King explains there are, just and unjust laws, One hasnot only a legal, but moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, onehas a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. A just law is a man-made codethat squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a cod e thatis out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of Saint ThomasAguinas, and unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and naturallaw. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades humanpersonality is unjust. ( Dr. King p.519-520). King is saying that just lawsshould be obeyed because they are the law and they are morally right. Morallyright is being or acting in accordance with established standards of goodbehavior. So, if a law is legal and good you should fallow it. People should notfollow unjust laws because they are wrong; you owe it to yourself morally. Ajust law is one that God would O.K; God is all loving, blind to any indifferenceand will forgive. The constitution says that all men are created equeal; sotherefore if the law is not the same to everyone, it is not a just law. Ifanyone is dehumanized it is an unjust law. Plain and simple, an unjust law makesyou feel bad about who or what you are . A just law should make y ou feel equaland proud to be a human being. While Thoreau focuses on what you might do abouta law, Dr. King focuses on what makes a law just or unjust. Thoreau knows thereare unjust laws; I believe he thinks as long as laws exist there will always bethe possibility of being unjust laws. Thoreau says yes, unjust laws exist butwhat are you going to do, just sit there or fight. Dr. King is trying to get into the heads of his fellow clergyman that unjust laws are morally wrong. Butthey both want to get the point across that you must do something to changeunjust laws because they are wrong and can take your God given freedom away. .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .postImageUrl , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:hover , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:visited , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:active { border:0!important; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:active , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Sherlock Holmes the Best Detective Sample EssayEven though both writers are writing on ways to be civil but disobedient, theyhave opposite ways of convincing you. Their concepts are similar but theirapproaches are totally opposite. Dr. Kings religious and moderate tone aretotally different from Thoreaus intense hatred for authority, mostly thegovernment. They both want to point a finger at the government. Thoreau believesthe best government is one which governs the least. Dr. King believes theprinciples of government are necessary to keep order, but need to live up toAll men are created equal. The underlying meaning that I got from readingboth essays was that you should fo llow your heart and your conscience againstinjustice and unjust laws, no matter what approach you choose to take. BibliographyLetter from Birmingham Jail Martin Luther King CivilDisobedience by Thoreau